AR Gaming Glasses: Price vs Practicality

Three models, one nagging caveat: price vs practicality.

The Verge’s hands-on testing pits Xreal’s 1S and One Pro against Viture’s Beast, evaluating them as portable displays for a Steam Deck, a Nintendo Switch 2, or any USB-C device. The core improvement across the lineup isn’t better games—it’s stability. All three rely on three degrees of freedom (3DoF) to anchor a private screen in space, so your image stays put instead of wobbling with every tilt of your head. That matters when you’re juggling a handheld and a headset, and it helps a lot for travelers who don’t want to fight a shifting picture mid-game. But it doesn’t magically erase the fundamental tradeoffs of AR glasses in a living-room-to-luggage workflow.

The numbers tell the story. Xreal’s 1S weighs about 85 grams, the One Pro around 91 grams, and Viture’s Beast roughly 96 grams. The lightest model is the most forgiving on the nose and ears in longer sessions, a subtle but real win for couch-and-commute gaming. Price isn’t trivial either: the 1S starts at $449, the Beast at $549, and the One Pro at $649. In other words, you’re paying a premium for private-screen convenience rather than for a blockbuster jump in image quality. And unlike many wearable tech in 2024, Verge notes there are no mandatory subscription fees attached to these glasses—the purchase is the purchase, with upgrades or apps existing in the ecosystem rather than as a required ongoing bill.

Where these glasses excel—and where they stumble—depends on your day-to-day use. Comfort, sound quality, and ease of use are the deciding factors beyond raw specs. The 3DoF approach makes the screen feel anchored in a spot you choose, which is a boon for ergonomic setups when you’re not gaming with true 6DoF head tracking. But the experience isn’t universal. The extra hardware weight, despite a relatively slim profile, will be felt after a long session, especially if you’re wearing the glasses over glasses or have sensitive bridges and ears. And while the private-screen promise is appealing, there’s no one-size-fits-all winner: each model has its own preference for fit, balance, and the feel of the display against the real world.

For context, the obvious alternative remains the built-in display of the handheld itself or a private monitor, especially when you’re at home. These glasses trade away brightness, color accuracy, and potentially latency for true portability and privacy. In the real world, that trade-off matters: a Switch or Steam Deck on a big screen is simpler, cheaper, and typically more robust for long sessions. The AR-glasses approach turns any USB-C device into a personal theater, but it is not yet a substitute for a dedicated gaming setup.

Industry watchers point to two practical takeaways. First, weight and comfort will decide the category’s mainstream success. Even a few extra grams can tilt a purchase decision for long play sessions, and pressurized use over hours may push users toward the lighter 1S. Second, the value curve remains highly device- and use-case specific. If you travel a lot and crave a private, large-screening experience on the go, these glasses become a compelling niche play. If you mainly game at home or want the cheapest path to a bigger screen, you’ll likely skip or wait for the next generation.

In the near term, the smart move is clear: dogfood these three options against your real-life habits. Buy if you prize a portable, private screen for irregular play sessions and travel, and you’re willing to pay a premium for a lighter, more comfortable model. Wait if you want to see further refinements in weight, brightness, and battery life before committing, or if you’re satisfied with the built-in display of a handheld. Skip if you need long, immersive sessions on a strict budget or you’re perfectly happy with a traditional monitor or the handheld’s own screen.

Sources

My dream pair of AR gaming glasses needs to have these nine features