NORD Digital Twins Accelerate Robotic Drive Development
By Sophia Chen

Image / therobotreport.com
NORD’s new digital twin platform promises to cut weeks, even months, from getting a robot’s drive system from concept to commissioning.
NORD Drivesystems says its digital twins, built from a user’s myNORD configuration, let robotics developers request individually created drive models for simulation. The goal is straightforward: verify early in planning whether a drive concept will actually work within a larger robotic system before a single line of hardware is built. In practice, that means engineers can run virtual commissioning—testing control logic, power budgets, and drive behavior in a safe, software-only environment—long before touching real actuators.
The company bases this capability on the familiar FMI standard, a data exchange protocol that has become the lingua franca of model-based testing since its birth in 2010. The technical approach combines model-based engineering with data-driven simulations to reflect how real drives perform under load, speed, and torque profiles. Engineering documentation shows NORD’s platform is designed to pull together a family of drives—standard, energy-saving variants, and explosion-protected configurations—into cohesive, analyzable models. The upshot for humanoid robotics teams, in particular, is a way to stress-test limb actuation and joint drive chains without risking hardware damage or costly rework in the lab.
From an industry perspective, the capability is a natural evolution of drive development. Historically, robotics teams had to imagine a drive’s behavior in a target robot while a separate, later-stage integration effort attempted to close the loop between hardware and control software. Virtual commissioning changes that calculus by letting engineers co-simulate mechanical, electrical, and control aspects in one living model. The result is faster iteration cycles and a higher likelihood that the first physical prototype behaves as intended when it finally ships.
What this means for field-readiness is nuanced. The platform is described as a digital service that accelerates planning and concept validation, implying a readiness level aligned with lab demonstrations and controlled-environment testing rather than in-field deployment. In other words, this is a powerful engineering tool for planning and risk reduction, not a turnkey robot already operating in production environments. Practitioners should view it as a bridge—closing the gap between concept and hardware by exposing discrepancies early, before expensive builds begin. Practically, that translates into better-informed torque budgets, wake-up times for joint actuators, and energy-use forecasts across a multi-joint drive train.
Two concrete practitioner insights stand out. First, the fidelity of the digital twin is as important as the tool itself. Virtual commissioning can save time, but only if the drive models faithfully reflect real-world dynamics, including friction, temperature effects, and flex in long drive trains. The FMI-based workflow helps by enabling model exchange across design ecosystems, but calibration remains essential. Second, the “one model fits all” temptation is risky. NORD’s approach—pulling from a catalog of individual drive configurations into a virtual model—makes sense for robotics with diverse actuation needs, from compact forearms to multi-jointed torsos. It also raises questions about how well specialized humanoid drive chains (high-torque, compact form factors, safety-rated control) transfer across a broader platform.
There are limits to watch. A strong digital twin is not a substitute for real-world validation; it’s a high-velocity filter for the risky choices that would otherwise materialize as hardware rework. The platform’s value will hinge on how quickly teams can translate virtual findings into hardware decisions, and how well NORD updates models as new drive variants—like energy-saving or explosion-protected options—enter the market.
If you’re racing to a humanoid’s next major milestone, this is the kind of tool you want in your corner: a way to sanity-check drive concepts before you commit. The next proofs of value will come as teams publish time-to-market improvements from live projects and show how their virtual commissioning cycles reduced field surprises.
Sources
Newsletter
The Robotics Briefing
Weekly intelligence on automation, regulation, and investment trends - crafted for operators, researchers, and policy leaders.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy for details.